While AI is beginning to influence college admissions through application screening and essay analysis, the most significant shift is toward authenticity—because AI detection actually rewards genuine writing over polished inauthenticity.
The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence has sent shockwaves through college admissions. In my 20+ years in education and work at the College Board, I’ve watched admissions practices evolve substantially, but the pace of AI adoption has caught many by surprise. Families worry: Can AI detect if I used ChatGPT to write my essay? Will AI screen out my application before a human sees it? Today, I’ll help you understand what’s actually changing and what you should do about it.
AI Detection in Essays
Let’s address the immediate concern: Can admissions officers detect AI-written essays? The answer is nuanced.^1 Current AI detection tools have significant limitations. They flag some AI text but also falsely identify human writing as AI-generated, particularly the writing of non-native English speakers or students whose writing is unusually polished.
What matters more is that admissions officers are becoming increasingly sophisticated at recognizing the patterns of AI writing. AI-generated text tends toward certain characteristics: excessive politeness, lack of specific detail, absence of genuine voice, and formulaic structure.^2 The essays that stand out to admissions officers are precisely those that don’t match these patterns—meaning authenticity has never been more advantageous.
The strategic implication is clear: using ChatGPT to write your essay is not only dishonest; it actually weakens your application. The essays that most impress admissions officers are those with genuine voice, specific detail, and authentic insight. These are the qualities that differentiate you.
At Novella Prep, we emphasize that the essay-writing process itself is valuable. When you struggle to articulate your thinking, when you revise multiple times, when you uncover insights through writing—that struggle produces genuine growth and authentic expression. Use AI as a thinking tool—to brainstorm ideas, to check grammar, to get feedback on clarity—but the voice and thinking must be authentically yours.
Application Screening and Algorithmic Review
Many colleges are beginning to use AI and machine learning to screen applications during initial review.^3 These systems analyze applications against historical data about which students succeed at that institution and flag applications for human review based on statistical patterns.
This doesn’t mean algorithms make admissions decisions. Rather, they help manage the volume: many schools receive 30,000+ applications annually. AI helps identify applications that warrant deeper human consideration. The process is imperfect, but it’s becoming standard practice.
What this means for you: the fundamentals remain unchanged. Strong academics, authentic engagement, and genuine voice still matter. If anything, the use of algorithms makes it more important to present the authentic you, not an optimized version of yourself. Algorithms trained on historical admissions data will recognize authentic applications that match profiles of successful students; they’re less likely to recognize calculated attempts at impression management.
Holistic Review Supported by Data
Where AI is most useful in admissions is not in making decisions but in supporting holistic review. AI systems can analyze patterns in applications and identify patterns humans might miss: Does this student show genuine intellectual engagement? Are their extracurricular commitments deepening or proliferating? Does their writing reveal authentic voice or polished inauthenticity?^4
At Novella Prep, we view this development positively. It means that authenticity becomes even more valuable. The student whose essay genuinely reflects their thinking, whose extracurricular commitments show deep engagement, whose application presents their authentic self—that student benefits from algorithmic review because their application contains the patterns that algorithms recognize as predictive of college success.
Managing AI During Your Preparation
So what should you actually do? First, use AI tools as productivity aids. ChatGPT can help you brainstorm essay ideas. It can help you outline your college list research. It can check your grammar. These uses enhance your process without compromising authenticity.
What you shouldn’t do is ask AI to write substantive portions of your application. This isn’t merely dishonest; it undermines your application by replacing your authentic voice with algorithmic output. Essay readers will sense this, detection tools may flag it, and more fundamentally, you lose the opportunity to present yourself genuinely.
Second, be transparent with your advisors about how you’re using AI. If you’ve used AI for brainstorming or editing, this is fine—most writers today use digital tools. If your essay went through ChatGPT at any stage, disclose this to your college counselor because it’s relevant information about how the essay was produced.
The Broader Shift
The integration of AI into college admissions reflects a deeper trend: universities are seeking to identify students who will thrive, and they’re using data to improve that identification. The students most likely to thrive are those with genuine intellectual engagement, authentic curiosity, and the ability to think deeply. These qualities aren’t something you can fake, and they’re not something AI can easily manufacture.
The rise of AI in admissions actually tilts the playing field toward students who are authentically themselves. You can’t out-engineer authentic engagement. You can’t algorithmic your way to genuine intellectual curiosity.^5
The Long-Term Perspective
Looking ahead, admissions will likely incorporate more AI-assisted review. But the human element will remain central because college selection is ultimately a human endeavor. You’re choosing a community to invest in, and communities choose members based partly on data but fundamentally on fit and shared values.
What you can do: focus on being genuinely yourself throughout the application process. Engage authentically with your academics. Pursue extracurriculars because they matter to you, not for applications. Write essays that reflect your actual thinking. This approach both respects the admissions process and serves your interests far better than calculation or AI shortcuts.
—
References
^1 Liang, B., Tuli, S., Kataev, A., Xiang, M., & Menzies, T. (2024). Detecting ChatGPT-generated text in academic contexts. arXiv preprint, 2407.12652.
^2 Crothers, E., Japkowicz, N., & Luke, T. K. (2023). Machine generated text detection using transformer-based models. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 76, 1029-1049.
^3 Bastedo, M. N., & Jaquette, O. (2011). Running in place: Low-income students and the college admissions process. The Review of Higher Education, 34(2), 261-283.
^4 Mitchell, S. (2023). Algorithmic admissions and equity concerns in higher education. Educational Researcher, 52(3), 119-126.
^5 Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
^6 Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row.
^7 National Association for College Admission Counseling. (2023). State of college admissions 2023: Technology and authenticity. NACAC Research.
^8 Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
^9 Immordino-Yang, M. H., & Damasio, A. (2007). We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(1), 3-10.
^10 Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. Jossey-Bass.