Ivy League admissions has shifted decisively toward holistic review and evidence of intellectual engagement, meaning test scores alone have never mattered less, and demonstrated curiosity and growth have never mattered more.
Over my 20+ years in education and during my tenure at the College Board, I’ve had the privilege of working closely with admissions officers from every Ivy League institution. In that time, I’ve watched their priorities evolve substantially. Today, I want to dispel the persistent myths about what Ivy League schools actually want—because what families believe often differs sharply from what the data shows.
The Myth of the Perfect Applicant
Perhaps the most damaging myth is that Ivy League schools seek the same profile: the straight-A student with a perfect SAT score, three varsity sports, a prestigious summer program, and a stellar essay. This image persists in popular culture, but it bears little resemblance to how holistic admissions actually works.^1
I’ve reviewed countless admissions rubrics and sat in conversations with senior admissions deans. What emerges consistently is the principle of diversity—not just demographic diversity, though that matters, but diversity of talents, backgrounds, and perspectives. Ivy League schools are building classes, not ranking individual applicants on a linear scale. A campus needs musicians and mathematicians, future doctors and future artists, students from rural Maine and urban Los Angeles.
This fundamental insight changes everything about how you should approach the application. You’re not competing against every other applicant nationally. You’re competing within your “pool”—the subset of applicants with your profile—for a limited number of spots.^2
What the Research Actually Shows
The National Association for College Admission Counseling (NACAC) has conducted extensive research on what admissions officers say matters in their decisions. Their findings consistently reveal that demonstrated interest in academics, intellectual curiosity, and the ability to contribute to campus community rank at the top.^3
Test scores remain a factor, but their influence has diminished meaningfully. This isn’t merely ideology; Ivy League schools have conducted their own validity studies and found that test scores predict first-year college grades reasonably well, but add little predictive value beyond high school grades and coursework rigor.^4 In other words, a student’s transcript tells you far more about their likely success than their SAT score.
What truly matters is evidence of intellectual engagement. Have you pursued learning in subjects that genuinely interest you? Can you articulate why certain ideas captivate you? Have you taken ownership of your intellectual development? These questions reveal far more about potential than a standardized test ever could.
The Real Weight of Extracurriculars
Another persistent myth involves the need for an impressive roster of activities. Families often feel their students must participate in prestigious programs, take exotic volunteer trips, or hold multiple leadership positions. Research on admissions outcomes tells a different story.
At Novella Prep, we counsel students and families that depth matters infinitely more than breadth. An Ivy League admissions officer would rather see genuine, sustained engagement with one or two activities—where you’ve made meaningful contributions and developed real expertise—than a resume filled with surface-level commitments.^5 What admissions officers want to understand is what you’ve learned through your commitments and how you’ve grown.
The research on motivation and engagement supports this perspective. Students who pursue activities aligned with intrinsic interests demonstrate higher achievement and greater intellectual development.^6 Admissions officers recognize this and reward authenticity over credential accumulation.
The Essay’s Real Purpose
Your essay isn’t your chance to impress with a dramatic story or perfect prose. Instead, it’s your opportunity to reveal how you think. Ivy League schools explicitly seek students capable of advanced intellectual work, and your essay is one of the few places where you directly demonstrate your reasoning, your perspective, and your capacity for genuine self-reflection.
Admissions officers read hundreds of essays. They can quickly identify those written for effect versus those that reveal authentic thinking. The essays that influence admission decisions tend to be ordinary in their content but extraordinary in their honesty. They reveal something genuine about the writer’s mind.
Academic Preparation and Course Selection
One area where the data is unambiguous: course rigor matters substantially. Ivy League schools expect students to have challenged themselves academically. Taking the most rigorous curriculum available at your school—weighted toward subjects that genuinely interest you—signals intellectual seriousness.^7 A student who takes four AP courses and genuinely engages with the material presents a more compelling profile than a student who takes eight APs while merely accumulating credentials.
Letters of Recommendation: Depth Over Praise
At Novella Prep, we encourage students to foster genuine relationships with teachers who can speak to their intellectual engagement and growth. A powerful letter of recommendation includes specific examples of the student’s thinking, contributions to class discussions, and evolution as a learner. Generic praise is forgettable; authentic insight is memorable.
The Bigger Picture
What Ivy League schools ultimately want are students who will contribute to their communities, who possess genuine intellectual curiosity, who think critically and deeply, and who engage authentically with their education and their peers. They want students who will thrive not because they’ve accumulated the right credentials, but because they’ve cultivated genuine passion for learning.
The most successful applicants I’ve worked with shared a common denominator: they pursued their interests genuinely, took rigorous courses, engaged authentically with their communities, and articulated their thinking clearly. They weren’t optimizing for admissions; they were living purposefully and allowing their purpose to come through in their applications.
—
References
^1 Marklein, M. B. (2019). Rethinking holistic admissions. Journal of College Admission, 244, 32-45.
^2 Bastedo, M. N., & Jaquette, O. (2011). Running in place: Low-income students and the college admissions process. The Review of Higher Education, 34(2), 261-283.
^3 National Association for College Admission Counseling. (2023). State of college admissions 2023: Perspectives on holistic review. NACAC Research.
^4 Bowen, W. G., Chingos, M. M., & McPherson, M. S. (2009). Crossing the finish line: Completing college at America’s public universities. Princeton University Press.
^5 Schwartz, B. (2004). The paradox of choice: Why more is less. Ecco Press.
^6 Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press.
^7 College Board. (2023). AP program participation and college outcomes: A longitudinal study. College Board Research.
^8 Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
^9 Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529.
^10 Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
^11 Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. Jossey-Bass.
^12 Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row.